Frank v. Phoenix Financial Services, LLC
Plaintiff: Ryan Frank
Defendant: Phoenix Financial Services, LLC
Case Number: 5:2022cv00300
Filed: July 1, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: John Antoon
Referring Judge: Philip R Lammens
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER dismissing case in light of #16 Notice of Pending Settlement. The Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge John Antoon II on 8/18/2022. (EK)
August 18, 2022 Filing 16 NOTICE of settlement pending by Phoenix Financial Services, LLC (Fleishman, Rachel)
August 16, 2022 Set/reset scheduling order deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 10/3/2022 Joinder of Parties due by 10/3/2022 Discovery due by 5/3/2023 Dispositive motions due by 6/1/2023 Pretrial statement due by 9/29/2023 All other motions due by 9/15/2023 Jury Trial set for 11/1/2022 before Judge John Antoon II. Conduct mediation hearing by 4/3/2023. Lead counsel to coordinate dates. Defendant disclosure of expert report due by 10/31/2022 Plaintiff disclosure of expert report due by 10/3/2022 (LAB)
August 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 CASE MANAGEMENT AND SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by Judge John Antoon II on 8/12/2022. (BRS)
August 10, 2022 Filing 14 CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT. (Fleishman, Rachel)
July 29, 2022 Filing 13 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to Complaint by Phoenix Financial Services, LLC.(Fleishman, Rachel)
July 26, 2022 Filing 12 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Ryan Frank. Related case(s): No (Goldberg, Philip)
July 26, 2022 Filing 11 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #10 Order by Ryan Frank. (Goldberg, Philip)
July 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER: Plaintiff shall file his Disclosure Statement within seven days from the date of this Order. Signed by Judge John Antoon II on 7/25/2022. (BRS)
July 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting #5 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint; Defendant's response to the complaint is due on or before July 29, 2022. Signed by Judge John Antoon II on 7/8/2022. (BRS)
July 8, 2022 Set/reset deadlines/hearings: for Phoenix Financial Services, LLC. Answer due by 7/29/2022. (LAB)
July 7, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Phoenix Financial Services, LLC. Related case(s): No (Fleishman, Rachel)
July 7, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Rachel Megan Fleishman on behalf of Phoenix Financial Services, LLC. Lead Counsel: Rachel M. Fleishman. (Fleishman, Rachel)
July 7, 2022 Filing 6 CORPORATE Disclosure Statement by Phoenix Financial Services, LLC. (Fleishman, Rachel)
July 7, 2022 Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Notice of Removal, by Phoenix Financial Services, LLC. (Fleishman, Rachel)
July 7, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael Schuette on behalf of Phoenix Financial Services, LLC (Schuette, Michael)
July 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 INITIAL CASE ORDER for both Plaintiff and Defendant - Notice of Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), which requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Counsel have 14 days from the date of this order to file their disclosure statement (if not already filed) and to notify the court of a related action (not required if there are no related actions). Signed by Judge John Antoon II on 7/1/2022. (AKC)
July 1, 2022 Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge John Antoon II and Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. New case number: 5:22-cv-0300-JA-PRL. (SJB)
July 1, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Fifth Judicial Circuit, Sumter County, Florida, case number 2022SC000544AXMX filed in State Court on 5/31/2022. Filing fee $402, receipt number AFLMDC-19732446 filed by Phoenix Financial Services, LLC. (Attachments: #1 State Court COMPLAINT, #2 State Court Docket Sheet, #3 State Court Other Documents, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Fleishman, Rachel)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Frank v. Phoenix Financial Services, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ryan Frank
Represented By: Philip Ross Goldberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Phoenix Financial Services, LLC
Represented By: Rachel Megan Fleishman
Represented By: Michael Schuette
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?