Stine v. Withers et al
| Mikeal Glenn Stine |
| Shannon D. Withers, FNU Philips, FNU Furchurm, FNU Hurley, FNU Sapp, T Sookdeo and United States Federal Bureau of Prisons |
| 5:2022cv00542 |
| November 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Sheri Polster Chappell |
| Philip R Lammens |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER to show cause, within 14 days from the date of this Order, why this case should not be dismissed for failure to keep the Court apprised of his address. as to Mikeal Glenn Stine. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 12/21/2022. (KLM)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER denying #2 Motion to Seal Case. The Clerk is directed to file the Complaint on the public docket. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 11/29/2022. (RLK)
|
|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER for all confined, pro se litigants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 11/9/2022. (RLK)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Mikeal Glenn Stine. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(RLK) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Seal Complaint (See DE.1) and Defendants Answer by Mikeal Glenn Stine. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(RLK) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
