Foley v. Florida Department of Corrections, Secretary
| Joseph Raymond Foley |
| Florida Department of Corrections, Secretary, Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General |
| 5:2022cv00656 |
| December 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Paul G Byron |
| Philip R Lammens |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Deborah A. Chance on behalf of Florida Attorney General, Secretary, Department of Corrections (Chance, Deborah) |
Filing 3
ORDER to respond and show cause why the petition should not be granted. Petitioner has 45 days to reply to the petition response. The Clerk is directed to serve the petition. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 12/19/2022. (Attachments: #1 Petition)(KLM)
|
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Paul G. Byron and Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. New case number: 5:22-cv-0656-PGB-PRL. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5 receipt number AFLMDC-20296599) filed by Joseph Raymond Foley. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Main Document Memorandum of Law in Support, #3 Exhibit)(McLain, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
