Johnson v. Perkins et al
| Marcus Johnson |
| FNU Perkins, C. Jones, FNU Blackmon, D. Luke, FNU Whitaker, D. Engessler, R. C. Cheatham, FNU Joseph, unknown Officer # 1, unknown Officer # 2 and A. Rich |
| 5:2023cv00387 |
| June 20, 2023 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| William F Jung |
| Philip R Lammens |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER: Within 30 days from the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall either file a fully completed Prisoner Consent Form and Financial Certificate (if Plaintiff desires to proceed as a pauper) or pay the $402.00 filing fee (if Plaintiff does not desire to proceed as a pauper). Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 7/19/2023. (KLM)
|
|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER for all incarcerated pro se litigants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 6/22/2023. (LAB)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE to the Court by Marcus Johnson. (LAB) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Marcus Johnson. (LAB) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Marcus Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(LAB) (No service copies provided). Modified on 6/22/2023 (LAB). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
