Semataska v. AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 3
| Kenneth P. Semataska |
| AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 3 |
| 5:2023cv00410 |
| June 28, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Philip R Lammens |
| James S Moody |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1362 ERISA |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
60-DAY ORDER OF DISMISSAL re #10 Notice of Settlement. All pending motions, if any, are DENIED as moot. The Clerk is directed to close the file. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 9/15/2023. (SMB)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of settlement by Kenneth P. Semataska (Henry, Claudeth) |
|
Filing 9
ENDORSED ORDER granting #8 Defendant's Second Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time. The deadline for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is extended to September 20, 2023. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 8/22/2023. (SMB)
|
| Filing 8 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to Complaint by AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 3. (Sokolow, Dena) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. |
|
Filing 7
ENDORSED ORDER granting #6 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time. The deadline for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is extended to August 21, 2023. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 7/28/2023. (SMB)
|
| Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to Complaint by AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 3. (Sokolow, Dena) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. |
| Filing 5 RETURN of service executed on 06/30/2023 as to AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 3 by Kenneth P. Semataska (Henry, Claudeth) (Modified on 7/13/2023 to edit docket text) (JDR). |
|
Filing 4
ENDORSED ORDER OF REFERRAL: This case is REFERRED to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge for preparation of a Scheduling Order and a Report and Recommendation regarding an appropriate resolution of the case. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 6/29/2023. (SMB)
|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 3. (BD) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge James S. Moody, Jr and Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. New case number: 5:23-cv-410-JSM-PRL. (AET) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 3 (Filing fee $402 receipt number AFLMDC-20990909) filed by Kenneth P. Semataska. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-0, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons)(Henry, Claudeth) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Semataska v. AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 3 | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kenneth P. Semataska | |
| Represented By: | Claudeth J. Henry |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 3 | |
| Represented By: | Dena H. Sokolow |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
