George v. Schofield et al
| Romancee Oshay George |
| Robert Schofield, FNU Kitchen, James Pappas, FNU O'Neal, FNU Coleman, FNU Whitlow and FNU Irving |
| 5:2023cv00738 |
| December 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| John L Badalamenti |
| Philip R Lammens |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER ruling deferred #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Plaintiff is directed to file a renewed application to proceed in forma pauperis on the Court's form and submit the Certificate and Prisoner Consent form or pay the $405 filing fee within 30 days from the date of this Order. The Clerk is directed to send the Plaintiff a blank application to proceed in forma pauperis and the attached prisoner consent form. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 1/3/2024. (KLS)
|
|
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER for all incarcerated pro se litigants. Signed by Judge Philip R. Lammens on 12/27/2023. (LAB)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Romancee Oshay George. (LAB) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Romancee Oshay George. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(LAB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
