Johnson v. Cook et al
| Hasan H. Johnson |
| FNU Cook, FNU Shinn, FNU Bostic, FNU SeBass, John Doe, I, FNU Ribiero, FNU Spell, FNU Rosado, FNU Kirkendall, FNU Ramsey, FNU Shields, FNU Smith, FNU Einstein, FNU Harr, FNU Cortopassi, FNU Perry, FNU Top and C. Carroll |
| 5:2024cv00130 |
| March 18, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Philip R Lammens |
| Carlos E Mendoza |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.11(e), which provides that, unless an order states another time, a seal under Rule 1.11 expires ninety days after a case is closed and all appeals are exhausted. To prevent the content of a sealed item from appearing on the docket after the seal expires, a party or interested non-party must move for relief before the seal expires. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (JDR) |
Filing 3
ORDER dismissing case without prejudice. The Clerk of Court shall close this case. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 4/29/2024. (MEH)
|
|
Filing 2
STANDING ORDER for all incarcerated pro se litigants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 3/19/2024. (LAB)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Hasan H. Johnson. (No fees paid, No service copies provided) (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(LAB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
