Grammar v. Warden, FCC Coleman Low
Petitioner: Donny Grammar
Respondent: Warden, FCC Coleman Low
Case Number: 5:2024cv00189
Filed: April 22, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Thomas P Barber
Referring Judge: Philip R Lammens
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 22, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 STANDING ORDER for all confined pro se litigants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 4/22/2024. (KLS)
April 22, 2024 Filing 6 Case TRANSFERRED from the Eastern District of Texas. Case assigned to District Judge Thomas P Barber and Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. New Case Number: 5:24-cv-189-TPB-PRL. (LMF)
April 22, 2024 Filing 5 Case transferred in from District of Texas Eastern; Case Number 9:24-cv-00054. File received electronically
April 18, 2024 Interdistrict transfer to the Middle District of Florida, Ocala Division. (ljw) [Transferred from txed on 4/22/2024.]
March 28, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER that the Clerk will TRANSFER this action to the Clerk of Court for the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Ocala Division. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine L. Stetson on 3/28/24. (ljw) [Transferred from txed on 4/22/2024.]
March 28, 2024 Filing 3 MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING TRANSFER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine L. Stetson on 3/28/24. (ljw) [Transferred from txed on 4/22/2024.]
March 28, 2024 Case will be transferred to another district 20 days from the date the Order of Transfer was entered on the docket, per Local Rule CV-83(b). (ljw) [Transferred from txed on 4/22/2024.]
March 20, 2024 Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Donny Grammar.(bjc) (Originally filed in 9:20cr23) [Transferred from txed on 4/22/2024.] Modified text on 4/22/2024 (KLS).
March 20, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 1 ORDERED that the Motion [Dkt. 34] is hereby DENIED. It is further ORDERED that the part of the Motion disputing the execution of Grammars sentence is SEVERED from this criminal case and be filed as a separate petition for writ of habeas corpus. The Clerk is INSTRUCTED TO FILE the Motion [Dkt. 34] as a petition in a new civil action. The new civil action shall be opened as a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 and assigned according to the regular practice for allotment of a new civil action. Signed by District Judge Michael J. Truncale on 3/20/2024. (bjc, ) (Originally filed in 9:20cr23) [Transferred from txed on 4/22/2024.]
March 20, 2024 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Christine L. Stetson. (bjc, ) [Transferred from txed on 4/22/2024.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Grammar v. Warden, FCC Coleman Low
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Donny Grammar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden, FCC Coleman Low
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?