Dalton v. Long et al
| Rivers D. Dalton |
| Q. Long and FNU Penn |
| 5:2024cv00429 |
| August 16, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Philip R Lammens |
| Steven D Merryday |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER denying without prejudice #3 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Plaintiff shall either pay the $405 filing fee or file a fully completed Application to Proceed in forma pauperis, financial certificate, Prisoner Consent form, and 6-month inmate account statement within 30 days of the date of this Order. The Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff a blank Application to Proceed in forma pauperis, Financial Certificate, and Prisoner Consent form. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 8/29/2024. (KLS)
|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER for all incarcerated pro se litigants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 8/16/2024. (LAB)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Rivers D. Dalton. (LAB) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Rivers D. Dalton. (LAB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Q. Long, FNU Penn filed by Rivers D. Dalton. (No service copies provided)(LAB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.