Colella et al v. Rogers et al
| Brian Colella and Patricia Pierce-Colella |
| Circuit Judge Steven G. Rogers, First Federal Bank of Kansas City and Brock & Scott, PLLC |
| 5:2025cv00293 |
| May 7, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Sheri Polster Chappell |
| Philip R Lammens |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Felony Securities Fraud, Obstruction, and Commercial Trespass by Brian Colella (HAI) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE and Demand for Judicial Accountability by Brian Colella (HAI) |
| Filing 14 Supplemental NOTICE of Fraud upon the Court and Void Judicial Order by Brian Colella (HAI) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE Of Factual Record, Ultra Vires Obstruction, and Fraud Upon the Court by Brian Colella (HAI) |
Filing 12
ENDORSED ORDER denying as moot Plaintiff's Motion to Vacate Void Order of May 12, 2025 and to Reinstate Verified TRO Complaint Based on Fraud, Lack of Standing, and Equitable Injury to Trust (Doc. #11). The motion is duplicative of Plaintiff's prior motion to vacate (Doc. #8) that the Court has already denied (Doc. #9). Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 5/30/2025. (BB)
|
| Filing 11 Renewed MOTION to Vacate #4 Order on Motion for Temporary Restraining Order by Brian Colella. (No red finger print on signature pages) (LMF) |
|
Filing 9
ORDERED: Plaintiff's Motion to Vacate Void Order of May 12, 2025 and to Reinstate Verified TRO Complaint Based on Fraud, Lack of Standing, and Equitable Injury to Trust (Doc. #8) is DENIED. Further frivolous filings may result in SANCTIONS. This case remains CLOSED. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 5/23/2025. (BB)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE by Brian Colella. (MGB) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Vacate #4 Order denying Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and dismissing #1 Complaint by Brian Colella and Patricia Pierce-Colella. (KLS) |
| Filing 7 SUPPLEMENT re #3 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order titled "Notice" by Brian Colella. (HAI) |
| Filing 6 SUPPLEMENT titled " Excerpt from the Notice of the Solicitor General" re #1 Complaint, by Brian Colella. (RLD) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.11(e), which provides that, unless an order states another time, a seal under Rule 1.11 expires ninety days after a case is closed and all appeals are exhausted. To prevent the content of a sealed item from appearing on the docket after the seal expires, a party or interested non-party must move for relief before the seal expires. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BD) |
|
Filing 4
ORDERED: Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (Doc. #3) is DENIED. The Complaint (Doc. #1) is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk is DIRECTED to deny any pending motions as moot, terminate any deadlines, and close the case. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 5/12/2025. (AEH)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order with Proposed Order by Brian Colella and Patricia Pierce-Colella. (Unsigned) (MGB) |
| Filing 2 AFFIDAVIT by Brian Colella. (MGB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Brock & Scott, PLLC, First Federal Bank of Kansas City, Steven G. Rogers Filing fee $405.00, receipt number OCA-13953 filed by Brian Colella, Patricia Pierce-Colella. (No service copies provided) (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(MGB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
