Schroeder et al v. Edward D. Jones & Co. L.P.
Plaintiff: Thomas Schroeder, Kay Ware, David Schroeder and Jane Hart
Defendant: Edward D. Jones & Co. L.P.
Case Number: 5:2025cv00713
Filed: November 7, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Philip R Lammens
Referring Judge: Julie S Sneed
Nature of Suit: Personal Property: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986 Neglect of Duty
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 28, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER. Defendant moves to stay this matter and compel arbitration pursuant to the parties' arbitration agreements. (Dkt. #18; see Dkt. #21.) Plaintiffs agree that this case must be submitted to arbitration. (See Dkt #18 at 1, 16.) Accordingly, Defendant's Motion to Stay and Compel Arbitration (Dkt. #18) is GRANTED. The parties are directed to arbitrate this dispute pursuant to their arbitration agreement (Dkt. #21). The case is stayed pending the completion of arbitration, and the parties are directed to notify the court upon resolution of the arbitration proceedings. The Clerk is directed to terminate all pending motions and deadlines, if any, and close this case. Signed by Judge Julie S. Sneed on 1/28/2026. (DM)
January 26, 2026 Filing 21 NOTICE by Edward D. Jones & Co. L.P. re #18 Unopposed MOTION to Compel Arbitration and for Stay of Proceedings , 20 Order (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(Holston, John)
January 26, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ENDORSED ORDER. The motion to compel arbitration refers to exhibits that have not been filed. (See Dkt. #18.) On or before January 30, 2026, Defendant shall file the exhibits referenced in its motion. Signed by Judge Julie S. Sneed on 1/26/2026. (DM)
January 23, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ENDORSED ORDER granting #17 Defendant's unopposed motion for additional time to respond to complaint. The court accepts #18 Defendant's motion to compel arbitration as timely filed. Signed by Judge Julie S. Sneed on 1/23/2026. (DM)
January 21, 2026 Filing 18 Unopposed MOTION to Compel Arbitration and for Stay of Proceedings by Edward D. Jones & Co. L.P.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Holston, John) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens.
January 20, 2026 Filing 17 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Edward D. Jones & Co. L.P.. (Johnson, Alise)
January 6, 2026 Filing 16 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under Rule 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Local Rule 3.03 by Jane Hart, David Schroeder, Thomas Schroeder, Kay Ware. (Sasson, Jamie)
January 6, 2026 Filing 15 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Jane Hart, David Schroeder, Thomas Schroeder, Kay Ware. Related case(s): Yes (Sasson, Jamie)
January 6, 2026 Filing 14 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under Rule 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Local Rule 3.03 by Edward D. Jones & Co. L.P. identifying Corporate Parent The Jones Financial Companies, LLLP for Edward D. Jones & Co. L.P. (Holston, John) Modified on 1/7/2026 to edit docket text. (WLB).
January 6, 2026 Filing 13 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Edward D. Jones & Co. L.P.. Related case(s): Yes (Holston, John)
December 30, 2025 Filing 12 RETURN of service executed on 12/08/2025 by Thomas Schroeder, David Schroeder, Jane Hart, Kay Ware as to Edward D. Jones & Co. L.P.. (Kesl, Garrett)
December 29, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ENDORSED ORDER granting #9 Defendant's unopposed motion for enlargement of time to respond to #1 the complaint. Defendant shall file its response on or before January 20, 2026. Signed by Judge Julie S. Sneed on 12/29/2025. (DM)
December 23, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 10 INITIAL ORDER re: Case Management and Deadlines. Signed by Judge Julie S. Sneed on 12/23/2025. (GNB)
December 22, 2025 Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Edward D. Jones & Co. L.P. (Johnson, Alise) Modified text on 12/23/2025 (CTR).
December 12, 2025 Filing 8 RETURN of service executed on December 8, 2025 by Thomas Schroeder, David Schroeder, Jane Hart, Kay Ware as to Edward D. Jones & Co. L.P.. (Sasson, Jamie)
November 14, 2025 Filing 7 SUMMONS issued as to Edward D. Jones & Co. L.P. (JVC)
November 13, 2025 Filing 6 PROPOSED summons to be issued by Jane Hart, David Schroeder, Thomas Schroeder, Kay Ware. (Sasson, Jamie)
November 13, 2025 Filing 5 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Jamie Alan Sasson on behalf of Jane Hart, David Schroeder, Thomas Schroeder, Kay Ware. Lead Counsel: Jamie Alan Sasson. (Sasson, Jamie)
November 13, 2025 Filing 4 NOTICE by Jane Hart, David Schroeder, Thomas Schroeder, Kay Ware re #1 Complaint and Re-Filing of Corrected Exhibits (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit)(Kesl, Garrett)
November 13, 2025 Filing 3 NOTICE TO ALL COUNSELS of Local Rule 2.02(a), which states, "The first paper filed on behalf of a party must designate only one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action." Counsel must file a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation identifying lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (AM)
November 12, 2025 Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Julie S. Sneed and Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. New case number: 5:25-cv-713-JSS-PRL. (LAW)
November 7, 2025 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Edward D. Jones & Co. L.P. with Jury Demand (Filing fee $405 receipt number AFLMDC-24096850) filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kesl, Garrett) Counsel to refile the exhibits with the proper page orientation. Modified text on 11/13/2025 (AM).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Schroeder et al v. Edward D. Jones & Co. L.P.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Thomas Schroeder
Represented By: Garrett Kesl
Represented By: Jamie Alan Sasson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kay Ware
Represented By: Garrett Kesl
Represented By: Jamie Alan Sasson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Schroeder
Represented By: Garrett Kesl
Represented By: Jamie Alan Sasson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jane Hart
Represented By: Garrett Kesl
Represented By: Jamie Alan Sasson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Edward D. Jones & Co. L.P.
Represented By: Alise M. Johnson
Represented By: John Wesley Holston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?