Dill et al v. Pannu Bros Trucking, Inc. et al
| Elisa F. Dill, Christi D. Thomas, Loritta D. Finch, Rachel Riggs and Mark Dillon |
| Pannu Bros Trucking, Inc., Whitehorse Freight, LLC, JST Truck Permits, JST Drug Testing, Inc., Jaswinder Singh and Rajvir Singh Baghri |
| 5:2025cv00822 |
| December 22, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Philip R Lammens |
| James S Moody |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 27 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.11(e), which provides that, unless an order states another time, a seal under Rule 1.11 expires ninety days after a case is closed and all appeals are exhausted. To prevent the content of a sealed item from appearing on the docket after the seal expires, a party or interested non-party must move for relief before the seal expires. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (JTM) |
Filing 26
ORDER: Plaintiffs' Motion for Remand (Dkt. #13) is granted but the request for fees and costs is denied. The Clerk is directed to remand this action to the Circuit Court of the Fifth Judicial Circuit, in and for Lake County, Florida, and provide that court with a copy of this Order. The Clerk is directed to close this case and terminate any pending motions. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 2/9/2026. (SMB)
|
| Filing 25 Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File Reply to Response to Motion to Remand by All Plaintiffs. (Gowdy, Bryan) |
| Filing 24 RESPONSE in Opposition re #13 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by JST Drug Testing, Inc., JST Truck Permits. (Hall, William) |
|
Filing 23
ENDORSED ORDER granting #21 Motion for Extension of Time to File; granting #16 Motion for Leave to File Document. The Court permits the untimely filing of the Motion to Dismiss but grants Plaintiffs an extension of time to respond to Pannu Bros Trucking, Inc., Jaswinder Singh, and Rajvir Singh Baghri's Motion to Dismiss, until twenty-one days after the Court rules on Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 2/4/2026. (JG)
|
| Filing 22 RESPONSE to Motion re #16 MOTION for Leave to File Rule 12 Motion filed by Elisa F. Dill, Mark Dillon, Loritta D. Finch, Rachel Riggs, Christi D. Thomas. (Gowdy, Bryan) |
| Filing 21 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to Pannu Bros, Singh, and Baghri's Motion to Dismiss by All Plaintiffs. (Gowdy, Bryan) |
| Filing 20 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief, specifically jurisdictional discovery by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Plaintiff's Personal Jurisdiction Interrogatories to Defendant JST Truck Permits, #2 Exhibit Plaintiff's Personal Jurisdiction Interrogatories to Defendant JST Drug Testing Inc, #3 Exhibit Plaintiff's Personal Jurisdiction Request for Production to Defendant JST Drug Testing Inc, #4 Exhibit Plaintiff's Personal Jurisdiction Request for Production to Defendant JST Truck Permits)(Gowdy, Bryan) |
| Filing 19 RESPONSE to Motion re #7 MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint filed by Elisa F. Dill, Mark Dillon, Loritta D. Finch, Rachel Riggs, Christi D. Thomas. (Gowdy, Bryan) |
| Filing 18 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under Rule 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Local Rule 3.03 by Elisa F. Dill, Mark Dillon, Loritta D. Finch, Rachel Riggs, Christi D. Thomas. (Camerlengo, Joseph) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Joseph V. Camerlengo, Jr on behalf of Elisa F. Dill, Mark Dillon, Loritta D. Finch, Rachel Riggs, Christi D. Thomas. Lead Counsel: Joseph V. Camerlengo. (Camerlengo, Joseph) |
| Filing 16 MOTION for Leave to File Rule 12 Motion by Jaswinder Singh. (Pahl, Benjamin) |
| Filing 15 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under Rule 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Local Rule 3.03 by Pannu Bros Trucking, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Pannu Bros Trucking, Inc. for Pannu Bros Trucking, Inc... (Pahl, Benjamin) |
| Filing 14 MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint by Rajvir Singh Baghri, Pannu Bros Trucking, Inc., Jaswinder Singh. (Pahl, Benjamin) |
| Filing 13 MOTION to Remand to State Court by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint, #2 Exhibit Proof of service (Pannu Bros), #3 Exhibit Proof of service (Rajvir Singh Baghri), #4 Exhibit Motion, #5 Exhibit Order granting Plaintiffs' unopposed motion for leave to file amended complaint, #6 Exhibit Proof of service (Jaswinder SIngh), #7 Exhibit Proof of service (JST Truck Permits), #8 Exhibit Proof of service (Whitehorse), #9 Exhibit Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint, #10 Exhibit Order granting Plaintiffs' unopposed motion for leave to file second amended complaint, #11 Exhibit Proof of service (JST Drug Testing))(Gowdy, Bryan) |
|
Filing 12
ENDORSED ORDER granting in part and denying in part #10 Plaintiffs' Opposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to the Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiffs' deadline to file a response to the pending motion to dismiss is extended to January 28, 2026. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 1/14/2026. (SMB)
|
| Filing 11 RESPONSE in Opposition re #10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #7 MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint filed by JST Drug Testing, Inc., JST Truck Permits. (Hall, William) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #7 MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint by All Plaintiffs. (Gowdy, Bryan) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Bryan Scott Gowdy on behalf of Elisa F. Dill, Mark Dillon, Loritta D. Finch, Rachel Riggs, Christi D. Thomas (Gowdy, Bryan) |
| Filing 8 SUPPLEMENT re #7 MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint by JST Drug Testing, Inc., JST Truck Permits. (Hall, William) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint by JST Drug Testing, Inc., JST Truck Permits. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Declaration)(Hall, William) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Benjamin S. Pahl on behalf of Rajvir Singh Baghri, Pannu Bros Trucking, Inc., Jaswinder Singh (Pahl, Benjamin) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Local Rule 2.02(a), which states, "The first paper filed on behalf of a party must designate only one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action." Counsel must file a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation identifying lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BD) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO COUNSEL Kyle J. Bagen, Steven A. Bagen Local Rule 2.01(c), Special Admission - File a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Co-counsel with filing rights may electronically file the motion on behalf of the lawyer seeking Special Admission or the motion may be filed in paper format; Pay the Special Admission Fee; (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BD) |
| Filing 3 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under Rule 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Local Rule 3.03 by JST Drug Testing, Inc., JST Truck Permits. (Hall, William) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge James S. Moody, Jr and Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. New case number: 5:25-cv-822-JSM-PRL. (AA) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Lake County Circuit Court, case number 35-2023-CA-001348-AXXX filed in State Court on March 22, 2023. Filing fee $405, receipt number AFLMDC-24260043 filed by JST Drug Testing, Inc. (Attachments: #1 State Court Second Amended Complaint, #2 State Court Docket Sheet, #3 State Court Other Documents, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hall, William) Modified text on 12/23/2025 (BD). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
