Manuel v. Carlton et al
| Devin Manuel |
| Warden E.K. Carlton, Warden and Warden Rivers |
| 5:2026cv00221 |
| March 30, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Philip R Lammens |
| Kathryn Kimball Mizelle |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Devin Manuel. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by Devin Manuel. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(LAW) |
Filing 5
ORDER granting #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis to the extent that Plaintiff shall pay an initial filing fee of $10.83 and is assessed the total $350 filing fee. The Clerk is directed to send a c of this Order to the Supervisor of inmate trust funds at Plaintiff's current place of incarceration. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 3/31/2026. (KLS)
|
|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER for all incarcerated pro se litigants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 3/31/2026. (RLD)
|
| Filing 3 PRISONER consent form and financial certificate by Devin Manuel. (RLD) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Devin Manuel. (RLD) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against E.K. Carlton, USP Coleman II, Warden filed by Devin Manuel.(no service copies provided)(RLD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
