Gilliard Love v. Boylston et al
| Marquis Jamel Gilliard Love |
| Benjamin M. Boylston, Joni M. Emling, Florida Department of Revenue Division of Child Support Enforcement and Jodi A. Zakara |
| 5:2026cv00448 |
| June 18, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Philip R Lammens |
| Anne-Leigh Gaylord Moe |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 18, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE to pro se litigant. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 6/18/2026. (MGB) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Marquis Jamel Gilliard Love. (MGB) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. |
| Filing 1 Emergency MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order, MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, MOTION for Order to Show Cause by Marquis Jamel Gilliard Love. (Attachments: #1 Certified Copy State Court Documents, #2 State Court Documents, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(MGB) Modified text on 6/18/2026 (MGB). |
| NOTICE to Marquis Jamel Gilliard Love - A pro se litigant may consent to receive Notices of Electronic Filings by completing the consent form linked #here or by visiting the court's website at https://www.flmd.uscourts.gov/litigants-without-lawyers (copy of consent program information sheet provided). (MGB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
