Jones, II v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Roger Van Jones, II |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSA |
| 5:2026cv00494 |
| July 8, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Philip R Lammens |
| Social Security: SSID Title XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under Rule 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Local Rule 3.03 by Commissioner of Social Security. (Selby, Jennifer) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Commissioner of Social Security. Related case(s): Yes (Selby, Jennifer) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Jennifer J Selby on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Selby, Jennifer) |
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 7/20/2026. (JWM)
|
| Filing 3 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. New case number: 5:26-cv-494-PRL. (KLS) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Roger Van Jones, II. (Smith, Daniel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Roger Van Jones, II. The plaintiff CONSENTS to jurisdiction of the United States magistrate judge filed by Roger Van Jones, II. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A (copy of AC decision), #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Designation of Lead Counsel)(Smith, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
