Renner v. Bisignano, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
| Jody Benner |
| Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration |
| SSA |
| 5:2026cv00592 |
| August 21, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Philip R Lammens |
| Social Security: SSID Title XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO COUNSEL Pamela C. Dunmore of Local Rule 2.02(a), which states, "The first paper filed on behalf of a party must designate only one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action." Counsel must file a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation identifying lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (KLS) |
| Filing 3 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. New case number: 5:26-cv-592-PRL. (KLS) |
| Filing 2 First MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by JODY BENNER. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Dunmore, Pamela) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Judicial Review of a Final Decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration against Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. The plaintiff CONSENTS to jurisdiction of the United States magistrate judge filed by JODY BENNER. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Dunmore, Pamela) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
