Campbell v. Pixar, et al
Plaintiff: Keith Campbell
Defendant: Pixar, Walt Disney Pictures and Television, Inc., Buena Vista Home Entertainment, Inc. and Disney Consumer Products International, Inc.
Case Number: 6:2002cv01368
Filed: November 15, 2002
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Gregory A Presnell
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2003. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 31, 2003 Northern District of California Court case # C 03-1259 (lak)
March 12, 2003 Original case file shipped UPS Ground on 3/13/03 tracking # 1Z 574 118 03 1007 848 3 (lak)
March 11, 2003 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER denying [12-1] motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, denying [10-1] motion to dismiss for improper venue, granting [10-2] motion to transfer venue. The Clerk is directed to transfer this case to the Northern District of California. The case is removed from the October 2004 trial calendar and the 9/13/04 final pretrial conference is cancelled. (Signed by Judge Gregory A. Presnell) ctc (lak)
March 11, 2003 TRANSFER to the Northern District of California (lak)
March 7, 2003 Filing 31 MOTION HEARING held on 3/7/03 re: [12-1] motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, [10-1] motion to dismiss for improper venue, [10-2] motion to transfer venue before Judge Gregory A. Presnell. Court takes matter under advisement; written order to follow. Court Reporter: Tony Rolland (lak)
February 20, 2003 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER referring case to mediation. The parties shall file a stipulation selecting a mediator within 11 days from the date of this order. Conduct hearing by 5/31/04. Lead counsel, Douglas P. Lambert, to coordinate dates. (Signed by Judge Gregory A. Presnell 2/19/03) ctc (lak)
February 14, 2003 Filing 29 AFFIDAVIT of/by Keith Campbell Re: [27-1] motion response, [26-1] motion response (lak)
February 14, 2003 Filing 28 NOTICE of filing affidavit by Keith Campbell (lak)
February 14, 2003 Filing 27 RESPONSE by Keith Campbell to [10-1] motion to dismiss for improper venue (lak)
February 14, 2003 Filing 26 RESPONSE by Keith Campbell to [12-1] motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction (lak)
February 14, 2003 Volume 2 begins with document # 30 (lak)
February 13, 2003 Filing 25 CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT (lak)
February 7, 2003 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER granting [23-1] motion to extend time until 2/14/03 to file a response to the motions to dismiss, response to motion set to 2/14/03 for [12-1] motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction by defendants, set to 2/14/03 for [10-1] motion to dismiss for improper venue by defendants (Signed by Judge Gregory A. Presnell) ctc (lak)
February 6, 2003 Filing 23 UNOPPOSED MOTION by Keith Campbell to extend time until 2/14/03 to file a response to the motions to dismiss (lak)
January 29, 2003 Filing 22 NOTICE (related) by Keith Campbell of pendency of other actions re: order of compliance to local rule - 6:02cv-723-orl-31JGG (lak)
January 29, 2003 Filing 21 NOTICE of filing Notice of Pendency Of Other Actions by Keith Campbell (lak)
January 27, 2003 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER granting [19-1] joint motion to continue hearing currently set for 02-07-03 on defendants' motion to dismiss for improper venue or, in the alternative, motion to transfer venue and defendant Pixar's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. Motion hearing rescheduled for 9:00 on 3/7/03. Scheduled for Judge Gregory A. Presnell (Signed by Judge Gregory A. Presnell) ctc (lak)
January 23, 2003 Filing 19 JOINT MOTION by plaintiff Keith Campbell, defendants Pixar, Walt Disney Pictures, Buena Vista Home, Disney Consumer Pro. to continue hearing currently set for 02-07-03 on defendants' motion to dismiss for improper venue or, in the alternative, motion to transfer venue and defendant Pixar's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction (jrm) Modified on 01/24/2003
January 17, 2003 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER: granting [15-1] motion for oral argument - Motion hearing set for 9:30 on 2/7/03 for [12-1] motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, [10-1] motion to dismiss for improper venue, [10-2] motion to transfer venue. Scheduled for Judge Gregory A. Presnell (Signed by Judge Gregory A. Presnell) ctc (lak)
January 17, 2003 Filing 17 RESPONSE to show cause order filed by plaintiff Keith Campbell (lak)
January 16, 2003 Filing 16 NOTICE (related) by Pixar, Walt Disney Pictures, Buena Vista Home, Disney Consumer Pro. of pendency of other actions re: order of compliance to local rule (lak)
January 8, 2003 Filing 15 MOTION by Pixar, Walt Disney Pictures, Buena Vista Home, Disney Consumer Pro. for oral argument on [12-1] motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, [10-1] motion to dismiss for improper venue, [10-2] motion to transfer venue (lak)
January 8, 2003 Filing 14 NOTICE of filing five affidavits by Pixar, Walt Disney Pictures, Buena Vista Home, Disney Consumer Pro. in support of motions for summary judgment (attached) (lak)
January 8, 2003 Filing 13 MEMORANDUM by Pixar, Walt Disney Pictures, Buena Vista Home, Disney Consumer Pro. in support of [12-1] motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction (lak)
January 8, 2003 Filing 12 MOTION by Pixar, Walt Disney Pictures, Buena Vista Home, Disney Consumer Pro. to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction (lak)
January 8, 2003 Filing 11 MEMORANDUM by Pixar, Walt Disney Pictures, Buena Vista Home, Disney Consumer Pro. in support of [10-1] motion to dismiss for improper venue, [10-2] motion to transfer venue (lak)
January 8, 2003 Filing 10 MOTION by Pixar, Walt Disney Pictures, Buena Vista Home, Disney Consumer Pro. to dismiss for improper venue or in the alternative to transfer venue (lak)
January 6, 2003 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER TO SHOW cause why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to respond to the Related Case Order. Response due on 1/21/03 for Keith Campbell (Signed by Judge Gregory A. Presnell) ctc (lak)
January 2, 2003 Filing 8 CERTIFICATE Of Interested Persons by Keith Campbell and Corporate Disclosure Statement. (lak)
December 26, 2002 Filing 7 CERTIFICATE Of Interested Persons by Pixar, Walt Disney Pictures, Buena Vista Home, Disney Consumer Pro. and Corporate Disclosure Statement (lak)
December 12, 2002 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting [4-1] motion for enlargement of time to serve a response to Plaintiff's complaint; reset answer due for 1/8/03 for Disney Consumer Pro., for Buena Vista Home, for Walt Disney Pictures, for Pixar ( Signed by Magistrate Judge James G. Glazebrook for Judge Baker) ctc (lak)
December 12, 2002 Filing 5 INTERESTED PERSONS ORDER For Civil Cases. Response due in 11 days from Defendants ctc (lak)
December 10, 2002 Filing 4 UNOPPOSED MOTION by Pixar, Walt Disney Pictures, Buena Vista Home, Disney Consumer Pro. with memorandum in support for enlargement of time to serve a response to Plaintiff's complaint (up to and including 01/08/03) (unopposed) Referred to Magistrate Judge David A. Baker. (nrs)
November 19, 2002 Filing 3 INTERESTED PERSONS ORDER For Civil Cases. Response due in 11 days. ctc (lak)
November 19, 2002 Filing 2 RELATED CASE ORDER and NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - TRACK 2. Response due in 11 days. (ctc) (lak)
November 15, 2002 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed alleging copyright and trademark infringement; jury demand. Filing fee $ 150.00 Receipt # 10078 (lak)
November 15, 2002 MAGISTRATE JUDGE CASE ASSIGNMENT Magistrate assigned: David A. Baker (lak)
November 15, 2002 SUMMONS issued for Pixar, Walt Disney Pictures, Buena Vista Home, Disney Consumer Pro. (lak)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Campbell v. Pixar, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Keith Campbell
Represented By: David Shawn O'Quinn
Represented By: Douglas P. Lambert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pixar
Represented By: Robert C. Yee
Represented By: James Vincent Etscorn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Walt Disney Pictures and Television, Inc.
Represented By: Robert C. Yee
Represented By: James Vincent Etscorn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Buena Vista Home Entertainment, Inc.
Represented By: Robert C. Yee
Represented By: James Vincent Etscorn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Disney Consumer Products International, Inc.
Represented By: Robert C. Yee
Represented By: James Vincent Etscorn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?