Mortgage Payment Protection, Inc. v. Cynosure Financial, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Mortgage Payment Protection, Inc.
Defendant: Cynosure Financial, Inc. and Virginia Surety Company, Inc.
Case Number: 6:2008cv01212
Filed: July 23, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office: Contract: Other Office
County: Seminole
Presiding Judge: David A. Baker
Presiding Judge: Anne C. Conway
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 8, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 234 ORDER denying 212 Motion for attorney fees; granting 216 Motion for summary judgment; denying 229 Motion to strike. The Clerk shall enter final judgment providing that Mortgage Payment Protection Inc. shall recover nothing on its claims agains t Cynosure Financial Inc. and enter final judgment providing that Cynosure Financial Inc. shall recover nothing on its counter-claims against Mortgage Payment Protection Inc. and thereafter CLOSE the file Signed by Chief Judge Anne C. Conway on 7/7/2011. (AKJ)
April 26, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 135 ORDER Adopting 111 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; Defendant Cynosure financial, Inc's Objection to the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 115 ), filed on March 29, 2010 is overruled; Denying 101 MOTION to dismiss or, Alternatively, to Preclude Introduction of New Evidence, Compel and Continue Discovery filed by Cynosure Financial, Inc. Signed by Chief Judge Anne C. Conway on 4/26/2010. (CH)
February 6, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER adopting 52 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ; Granting 42 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint; Denying as moot 39 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings, 46 Motion for Joinder, 47 MOTION for leave to file Reply Brief, 49 Motion for Leave to File Reply. Signed by Chief Judge Anne C. Conway on 2/5/2009. (CH)
January 20, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 52 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 39 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings, 42 MOTION to amend/correct Complaint, 46 MOTION for joinder with Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, 47 MOTION for leave to file Reply Brief, 49 MOTION for leave to file A Reply to VSC's Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge David A. Baker on 1/20/2009. (EC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mortgage Payment Protection, Inc. v. Cynosure Financial, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mortgage Payment Protection, Inc.
Represented By: J. Scott Murphy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cynosure Financial, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Virginia Surety Company, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?