Perez-Santiago v. Volusia County, Department of Elections, et al
Crimilda Perez-Santiago |
Ann McFall, Karen Harris, Frank Celeste, Lisa Lewis and Volusia County, Department of Elections |
6:2008cv01868 |
November 4, 2008 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Civil Rights: Voting Office |
Volusia |
John Antoon II |
Karla R. Spaulding |
None |
Federal Question |
42:1973 Voting Rights Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 131 ORDER denying 64 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 65 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge John Antoon II on 3/11/2010. (EK) |
Filing 97 ORDER adopting 89 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; granting 71 MOTION to withdraw Joel Robles' Claims and Representation of Mr. Robles; dismissing Plaintiff Joel Robles' claims without prejudice. Signed by Judge John Antoon II on 12/28/2009. (BRS) |
Filing 48 ORDER granting 23 Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants Ann McFall and the Volusia County Department of Elections, and dismissing Amended Complaint insofar as it pertains to these Defendants; denying as moot 30 Motion to Dismiss; granting withou t prejudice in part and denying in part 39 Amended Motion to Dismiss filed by Volusia County; dismissing claim of Plaintiff Volusia County Hispanic Association without prejudice and with leave to amend; and setting deadline for amendment. Signed by Judge John Antoon II on 8/25/2009. (EK) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.