Nash v. Miguel A. Medina, M.D., P.A.
Plaintiff: Mary Nash
Defendant: Miguel A. Medina, M.D., P.A.
Case Number: 6:2009cv00382
Filed: February 26, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other Office
County: Brevard
Presiding Judge: John Antoon II
Presiding Judge: Gregory J. Kelly
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 29:0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 9, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER denying 28 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge John Antoon II on 8/9/2010. (EK)
May 27, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER denying 6 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge John Antoon II on 5/27/2009. (EK)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nash v. Miguel A. Medina, M.D., P.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mary Nash
Represented By: Matthew W. Dietz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Miguel A. Medina, M.D., P.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?