American Coach Lines of Orlando, Inc. v. North American Bus Industries, Inc. et al
| American Coach Lines of Orlando, Inc. |
| North American Bus Industries, Inc. and Blue Bird Corporation |
| 6:2009cv01999 |
| November 24, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Orlando Office |
| Orange |
| Patricia C. Fawsett |
| Gregory J. Kelly |
| Plaintiff |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
85
ORDER granting 33 Motion for summary judgment. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment for Defendants North American Bus Industries, Inc. and Blue Bird Corporation and against Plaintiff American Coach Lines of Orlando, Inc. on Counts I - XII of the Complaint and close the case. Signed by Senior Judge Patricia C. Fawsett on 2/14/2011. (JSH)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER granting 64 Motion to File Voluminous Records in Alternative Format. Signed by Senior Judge Patricia C. Fawsett on 1/10/2011. (JSH)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER deferring ruling on 33 Motion for summary judgment. The parties are directed to file memoranda of law with evidentiary support pursuant to the schedule provided in the Order. Oral argument shall be heard on the Motion and shall be set by separate notice. Signed by Senior Judge Patricia C. Fawsett on 10/8/2010. (JSH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
