Blanck v. Altamonte Springs Police Department et al
| James Edward Blanck |
| Kevin Acosta, James Wolfe, Justin Lemieux, Carl Rentfro, Michelle Chapman, Daniel Smith, Alan Williams, Sharon Williams, Mary Michel, Luis Gonzalez, City of Altamonte Springs and City of Longwood |
| Daniel Smith |
| James Edward Blanck |
| 6:2011cv00293 |
| February 24, 2011 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Orlando Office |
| Seminole |
| G. Kendall Sharp |
| Karla R. Spaulding |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
102
ORDER Denying 76 Motion for sanctions; Adopting Report and Recommendations re 88 Report and Recommendations. Judgment having been entered in favor of all Defendants (Doc. Nos. 83, 84), and there being no further pending issues, the Clerk of the Court is directed to close this file. Signed by Judge John Antoon II on 10/17/2011. (DJD)
|
Filing
83
ORDER granting 18 , 23 , 26 , 27 , 53 , and 56 Motions to Dismiss insofar as the motions seek dismissal of the Amended Complaint; denying as moot 18 , 23 , 26 , 27 , 53 , and 56 insofar as they seek a more definite statement; denying a s moot 19 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; dismissing with prejudice all counts against all Defendants; directing Clerk to enter judgment; and reserving jurisdiction to address 76 Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions. Signed by Judge John Antoon II on 8/11/2011. (EK)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.