Pantelakos Jr. v. Spadafora et al
| James Peter Pantelakos Jr. |
| Michael Spadafora, Daniel Ogden, Candice Matthews, Sergeant Gamin, Frances Dufrense and All Unknown Others |
| 6:2011cv00947 |
| June 7, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Orlando Office |
| Brevard |
| David A. Baker |
| Mary S. Scriven |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
82
ORDER adopting 80 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff James Peter Pantelakos, Jr.'s Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis 78 is DENIED. Petitioner IS NOT entitled to appeal as a pauper and shall pay the appellate filing fee. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 12/19/2012. (BGS)
|
|
Filing
72
ORDER granting 69 Motion to reschedule settlement conference; granting 71 Motion for clarification. The settlement conference scheduled for October 17, 2012 and pre-settlement conference meet and confer dates are CANCELED. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of the order to Plaintiff. If any counsel has a telephone or facsimile number or email address for Plaintiff, counsel shall promptly inform Plaintiff that the settlement conference has been canceled. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karla R. Spaulding on 10/4/2012. (Spaulding, Karla)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
