North Pointe Insurance Company v. Global Roofing & Sheet Metal, Inc. et al
North Pointe Insurance Company |
Paramount Insurance Repair Service, Inc., Shakerwood Association, Inc. and Global Roofing & Sheet Metal, Inc. |
6:2012cv00476 |
March 28, 2012 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Orlando Office |
Orange |
Gregory J. Kelly |
Gregory A. Presnell |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 66 ORDER denying 56 Motion for summary judgment. Signed by Judge Gregory A. Presnell on 5/1/2013. (ED) |
Filing 54 ORDER adopting 48 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 43 MOTION for default judgment against Global Roofing & Sheet Metal, Inc. Signed by Judge Gregory A. Presnell on 10/31/2012. (ED) |
Filing 52 ORDER adopting 50 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 29 MOTION for default judgment against Global Roofing & Sheet Metal, Inc. filed by North Pointe Insurance Company. 2.The Motion for Final Default Judgment filed at Doc. No. 29 is DENIED as MOOT. The Revised Motion for Default Judgment filed at Doc. No. 43 remains pending before the Court. Signed by Judge Gregory A. Presnell on 9/21/2012. Copies mailed.(LAM) |
Filing 42 ORDER directing Plaintiff to comply with Local Rule 3.01(a) by filing a memorandum of law in support of its motion for default judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas B. Smith on 7/26/2012. (Smith, Thomas) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.