Lock v. City of West Melbourne, Florida et al
| Brian Lock |
| City of West Melbourne, Florida, Stephany Eley, Michael Hazlett and Hal Rose |
| 6:2012cv00680 |
| May 4, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Orlando Office |
| Brevard |
| Charlene Edwards Honeywell |
| Gregory J. Kelly |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
183
ORDER: 1. The City's Amended Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment 179 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. As no genuine issues of material fact exist, the City's Amended Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED as to Counts II and III of the Second Amended Complaint. The City's motion is DENIED as to Counts I and IV. 2. The Individual Defendants' Renewed Motions for Summary Judgment 172 , 173 , 174 are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. As no genuine issues of material fact exist, the Individual Defendants' Renewed Motions for Summary Judgment (Docs. 172, 173, 174) are each GRANTED as to Count V of the Second Amended Complaint. As to Count VI, the motions filed by Rose and Eley (Docs. 172 and 174) are GRANTED, and the motion filed by Hazlett (Doc. 173) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as set forth more specifically herein. As to Count VII, the Individual Defendants' Renewed Motions for Summary Judgment (Docs. 172, 173, 174) are each DENIED, as moot. 3. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Lock's request (Doc. 99, p. 14), Count VII is DISMISSED with prejudice. 4. A Final Judgment will be entered at the conclusion of this litigation. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 4/24/2015. (BGS)
|
|
Filing
140
ORDER denying without prejudice 66 Motion for summary judgment; denying without prejudice 67 Motion for summary judgment; denying without prejudice 68 Motion for summary judgment; granting in part and denying in part 69 Motion for summary jud gment. As no genuine issues of material fact exist, the City's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED as to Counts I, II, and III of the Second Amended Complaint. In all other respects, the City's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED wit hout prejudice. Stephany Eley's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED without prejudice. Michael Hazlett's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED without prejudice. Hal Rose's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to terminate any pending motions and deadlines as moot, enter judgment in favor of the City only as to Counts I, II, and III of the Second Amended Complaint, and close this case. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 12/23/2013. (JO)
|
|
Filing
112
ORDER denying 110 motion for discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas B. Smith on 10/10/2013. (SMW)
|
|
Filing
94
ORDER granting 92 Motion to extend time to file stipulation of undisputed facts. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas B. Smith on 7/12/2013. (Smith, Thomas)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
