Arvelo v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
| Edwin Arvelo |
| Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida |
| 6:2012cv01823 |
| December 3, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Orlando Office |
| Orange |
| Gregory A. Presnell |
| Karla R. Spaulding |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
65
ORDER denying 11 Petition for writ of habeas corpus filed by Edwin Arvelo This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Petitioner is DENIED a certificate of appealability in this case.The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Respondents and to close this case. Signed by Judge Gregory A. Presnell on 2/3/2016. (TKW)
|
|
Filing
18
OPINION AND ORDER denying 11 Petition for writ of habeas corpus, and this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly and is directed to close this case.This Court should grant an application for cer tificate of appealability only if the Petitioner makes "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). Petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Accordingly, a Certificate of Appealability is DENIED in this case. Signed by Judge Gregory A. Presnell on 3/4/2014. (TKW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
