Endemano v. Secretary, Department of Homeland Security et al
Trixy E. Endemano |
Transportation Security Administration and Secretary, Department of Homeland Security |
6:2013cv00348 |
February 28, 2013 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Orlando Office |
Orange |
Charlene Edwards Honeywell |
Thomas B. Smith |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex) |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 38 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 21 The Secretary's Motion to Dismiss. a. Counts I and III are DISMISSED with prejudice to the extent they seek to impose liability for actions occurring before September 1, 2009, because those acti ons are time-barred. b. Counts I and III are DISMISSED without prejudice to the extent they seek to impose liability for actions occurring on or after September 1, 2009, because Endemano failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted as t o such actions. c. In all other respects, the Secretary's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. To the extent that Endemano wishes to re-plead claims dismissed without prejudice, she is granted leave to file a Second Amended Complaint within TWENTY-ONE (21) days of the date of this Order, which cures the deficiencies noted in this Order. Otherwise, this action will proceed on the Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 3/19/2014. (BGS) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.