Selzer v. Commissioner of Social Security

Plaintiff: Cindy Marie Selzer
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 6:2013cv00663
Filed: April 24, 2013
Court: Florida Middle District Court
Office: Orlando Office
County: Volusia
Referring Judge: Gregory J. Kelly
Presiding Judge: Gregory A. Presnell
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Title XVI
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 27, 2015 13 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER adopting 12 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS granting 11 Unopposed MOTION to Reopen Case and Affirm filed by Commissioner of Social Security. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment and close the case. Signed by Judge Gregory A. Presnell on 4/27/2015. Copies mailed.(LAM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Selzer v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cindy Marie Selzer
Represented By: Eddy Pierre Pierre
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?