Ortiz v. Commissioner of Social Security

Justia Dockets & Filings Eleventh Circuit Florida Middle District Ortiz v. Commissioner of Social Security

Ortiz v. Commissioner of Social Security

Plaintiff:	Desiree Santana Ortiz
Defendant:	Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number:	6:2013cv00763
Filed:	May 14, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office:	Orlando Office
County:	Osceola
Presiding Judge:	Charlene Edwards Honeywell
Presiding Judge:	Thomas B. Smith
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: SSID Title XVI
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 9, 2014	Filing 25 ORDER adopting 24 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. (1)The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects and is made a part of this Order for all purposes, including appella te review. (2) Plaintiff's Uncontested Petition for Attorney's Fees, pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. Section 2412(d) 23 is GRANTED. (3) Finding the number of hours and hourly rate to be reasonable, Plaintiff is hereby award attorney's fees in the amount of $2,962.29 to be paid out of the judgment fund and to Plaintiff's counsel if the Commissioner determines Plaintiff does not owe a debt to the Government. (4) The Clerk is directed to enter a Judgment in favor of Plaintiff awarding attorney's fees in the amount of $2,962.29. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 9/9/2014. (BGS)
June 23, 2014	Filing 21 ORDER adopting 20 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects and is made a part of this Order for all purposes, including appellate review. The Decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with the findings in the Report and Recommendation. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and to close t his case. Plaintiff is advised that the deadline to file a motion for attorneys' fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) shall be thirty (30) days after Plaintiff receives notice from the Social Security Administration of the amount of past du e benefits awarded. When Plaintiff receives notice of the amount of past due benefits awarded, Plaintiff must promptly email the Commissioner's lawyers, Mr. Rudy and the OGC attorney who prepared the Commissioner's brief to advise them when the notice was received. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 6/23/2014. (BGS)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 9, 2014

Filing 25 ORDER adopting 24 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. (1)The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects and is made a part of this Order for all purposes, including appella te review. (2) Plaintiff's Uncontested Petition for Attorney's Fees, pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. Section 2412(d) 23 is GRANTED. (3) Finding the number of hours and hourly rate to be reasonable, Plaintiff is hereby award attorney's fees in the amount of $2,962.29 to be paid out of the judgment fund and to Plaintiff's counsel if the Commissioner determines Plaintiff does not owe a debt to the Government. (4) The Clerk is directed to enter a Judgment in favor of Plaintiff awarding attorney's fees in the amount of $2,962.29. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 9/9/2014. (BGS)

June 23, 2014

Filing 21 ORDER adopting 20 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects and is made a part of this Order for all purposes, including appellate review. The Decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with the findings in the Report and Recommendation. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and to close t his case. Plaintiff is advised that the deadline to file a motion for attorneys' fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) shall be thirty (30) days after Plaintiff receives notice from the Social Security Administration of the amount of past du e benefits awarded. When Plaintiff receives notice of the amount of past due benefits awarded, Plaintiff must promptly email the Commissioner's lawyers, Mr. Rudy and the OGC attorney who prepared the Commissioner's brief to advise them when the notice was received. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 6/23/2014. (BGS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ortiz v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Desiree Santana Ortiz
Represented By:	Richard A. Culbertson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?