Bruskotter v. Robert Bosch Tool Corporation
Plaintiff: Erik Bruskotter
Defendant: Robert Bosch Tool Corporation
Case Number: 6:2013cv01841
Filed: November 25, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office: Orlando Office
County: Orange
Presiding Judge: John Antoon
Presiding Judge: David A. Baker
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury- Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 3, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 90 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 47 Motion in Limine; granting 48 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 9/3/2015. (KMS)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bruskotter v. Robert Bosch Tool Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Erik Bruskotter
Represented By: John K. Chapman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert Bosch Tool Corporation
Represented By: Charles D. Bavol
Represented By: Melissa D. Krepps
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?