Employment Law Compliance. Inc. v. Empower Software Solutions, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Employment Law Compliance, Inc.
Defendant: Empower Software Solutions, Inc. and HRSmart, Inc.
Counter_claimant: HRSmart, Inc. and Empower Software Solutions, Inc.
Counter_defendant: Employment Law Compliance, Inc.
Case Number: 6:2014cv00663
Filed: April 29, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office: Orlando Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Gregory A. Presnell
Presiding Judge: Karla R. Spaulding
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 72 ORDER granting 58 motion to stay; denying without prejudice 66 motion to dismiss; denying without prejudice 68 motion to dismiss; denying as moot 71 Motion to extend time. Signed by Judge Gregory A. Presnell on 6/12/2014. (JU)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Employment Law Compliance. Inc. v. Empower Software Solutions, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Empower Software Solutions, Inc.
Represented By: David J Shaw
Represented By: Goutam Patnaik
Represented By: Michael David Crosbie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HRSmart, Inc.
Represented By: W. Drew Sorrell, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Employment Law Compliance, Inc.
Represented By: Steven H Washam
Represented By: John J Reenan
Represented By: Mary Elizabeth Lanier
Represented By: Scott Harper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_claimant: HRSmart, Inc.
Represented By: W. Drew Sorrell, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_claimant: Empower Software Solutions, Inc.
Represented By: Michael David Crosbie
Represented By: Goutam Patnaik
Represented By: David J Shaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_defendant: Employment Law Compliance, Inc.
Represented By: Scott Harper
Represented By: Mary Elizabeth Lanier
Represented By: John J Reenan
Represented By: Steven H Washam
Represented By: Scott Harper
Represented By: Mary Elizabeth Lanier
Represented By: John J Reenan
Represented By: Steven H Washam
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?