Higgins v. Hamilton County Child Protection Service
| Pauletta Higgins |
| Hamilton County Child Protection Service, Kim Sexton, Alexandria Patsfall, Julie Harrison, Ernest Lee, Marjorie Davis, Ericka Dority, Kacy Eves, Brenda Anthony, Krista Long, Tiffany Freed, Gloria Campbell, Allison McWorther, Kim Hafford, Tamika Moore and Brittanie Dudley |
| 6:2014cv00832 |
| May 30, 2014 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Orlando Office |
| Orange |
| Charlene Edwards Honeywell |
| Thomas B. Smith |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
ORDER adopting 4 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects and is made a part of this Order for all purposes, including appellate review. Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED, without prejudice. The Court notes that Plaintiff has already filed an Amended Complaint. See Doc 6. Therefore, there is no reason to give Plaintiff twenty-one (21) days to file an amended complaint. The Court accepts Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, as the complaint filed in response to the Report and Recommendation. A ruling on Plaintiff Pauletta Higgins' Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis 3 is DEFERRED, pending the Magistrate Judge's review of the Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 6/23/2014. (BGS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.