Roberts v. Endurance Communications & Electrical, LLC. et al
Damasi Roberts |
Endurance Communications & Electrical, LLC., 4Evolution, Inc. and Chirstopher Riley |
6:2015cv00810 |
May 20, 2015 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Orlando Office |
Orange |
Carlos E. Mendoza |
Thomas B. Smith |
Fair Labor Standards Act |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 37 ORDER denying as moot 34 Motion for entry of judgment; Adopting in part and determined to be Moot in part Report and Recommendations - re 35 Report and Recommendations; Granting 36 Amended Renewed Unopposed Motion for Entry of Judgment. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment against Defendants Endurance Communications & Electrical, LLC and 4Evolution, Inc. as follows: a. in favor of Damasi Roberts in the amount of $9000.00; b. in favor of Arnold Hervy in the amount of $ ;483.72; c. in favor of Victor Brown in the amount of $9211.70; d. in favor of Jean Fleurvil in the amount of $7917.78; e. in favor of Lonel Gabriel in the amount of $8276.20; f. in favor of Wagens Aimable in the amount of $2636.1 0. On or before December 5, 2016, Plaintiffs shall file a status report with the Court regarding the status of Defendant Christopher Riley's bankruptcy proceeding and Plaintiffs' intent to continue prosecuting this case as to Riley. The Clerk is directed to administratively close this case. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 11/21/2016. (DJD) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.