Trzcinka v. Ramirez
Plaintiff: June A. Trzcinka
Defendant: Armando Ramirez
Case Number: 6:2015cv01055
Filed: June 29, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office: Orlando Office
County: Osceola
Presiding Judge: David A. Baker
Presiding Judge: Gregory A. Presnell
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 3, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 58 ORDER denying 44 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Gregory A. Presnell on 11/3/2016. (CHT)
August 12, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER granting 10 motion to dismiss. Signed by Judge Gregory A. Presnell on 8/12/2015. (JU)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Trzcinka v. Ramirez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: June A. Trzcinka
Represented By: Myra Nicholson
Represented By: Laurence James Pino
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Armando Ramirez
Represented By: Michael H. Bowling
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?