Henning v. Wing et al
| Bryan Henning |
| Jennifer Wing, A. Clarke, City of Orlando and Johnson's Wrecker Service Inc |
| 6:2015cv01518 |
| September 15, 2015 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Orlando Office |
| Orange |
| David A. Baker |
| Carlos E. Mendoza |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
ORDER granting 6 Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis/affidavit of indigency; Adopting in part and rejecting in part Report and Recommendations re 9 Report and Recommendations. Plaintiff's Objection to the Report and Recommend ation (Doc. 10) is SUSTAINED. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a summons and Marshal 285 form to Plaintiff for completion. Plaintiff shall return the completed summonses and Marshal 285 forms to the Clerk of Court within fifteen days of mailing. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 5/2/2016. (DJD)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER overruling plaintiff's objections 4 ; Denying without prejudice 2 Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis/affidavit of indigency; Adopting Report and Recommendations re 3 Report and Recommendations. On or before 11/30/15, plaintiff shall either pay the filing fee in full or file an amended motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 11/12/2015. (DJD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
