Baumann et al v. Bank of America, N.A et al
James E. Baumann and Debora K. Baumann |
Bank of America, N.A, Quarles & Brady LLP, Prober & Raphael and Marinosci Law Group, PC |
6:2015cv01951 |
November 17, 2015 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Orlando Office |
Volusia |
Paul G. Byron |
Gregory J. Kelly |
Real Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 167 ORDER denying 165 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 3/27/2019. (JRJ) |
Filing 166 ORDER adopting in part and rejecting in part 163 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 11 Amended Complaint filed by Debora K. Baumann, James E. Baumann. The Recommendation that this case be dismissed with prejudice is REJECTED. In all other res pects, the R&R is ADOPTED, CONFIRMED, and made a part of this Order. Plaintiff's Objection (Doc. 164) is OVERRULED. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to Defendant Prober & Raphael. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close the file. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 2/27/2019. (MMW) |
Filing 161 ORDER granting 156 Defendant Marinosci Law Group, PC's Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 158 Plaintiff James E. Baumann's Motion for Summary Judgment. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of Defendant, Marinosci Law Group, PC, and against Plaintiffs, James E. Baumann and Debora K. Baumann, as to Counts III and IV. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 2/1/2019. (JRJ) |
Filing 132 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 16 Defendant Marinosci Law Group, PC's Motion to Dismiss. The Motion is granted insofar as it seeks dismissal of Plaintiff Debora Baumann's claims against Marinosci Law Group, PC. In all other respects, the Motion is denied. Defendant Marinosci SHALL answer the Amended Complaint no later than fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 7/23/2018. (JRJ) |
Filing 130 ORDER striking 129 Defendant Marinosci Law Group PC's Renewed Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 7/18/2018. (JRJ) |
Filing 76 ORDER denying 71 Plaintiffs' Amended Motion to Certify Interlocutory Appeal and to Stay Proceedings. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 11/29/2016. (SEN) |
Filing 66 ORDER denying 61 Plaintiffs' Motion to Vacate Void Orders. All dates and deadlines in 60 the Amended Case Management and Scheduling Order remain in effect. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 10/18/2016. (SEN) |
Filing 57 ORDER granting in part and denying as moot in part 44 Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend the Case Management and Scheduling Order; granting 51 Defendant Bank of America, N.A.'s Motion to Extend Discovery and Dispositive Motions Deadlines. The deadline for conducting discovery is extended to and including December 2, 2016. The deadline for filing dispositive motions and Daubert motions is extended to and including January 6, 2017. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 10/11/2016. (SEN) |
Filing 47 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 16 Defendant Marinosci Law Group, PC's Amended Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 28 Defendant Bank of America, N.A.'s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' [Amended] Compl aint; granting in part and denying in part 29 Defendant Quarles & Brady, LLP's Motion to Dismiss the Verified First Amended Complaint. Plaintiffs have until and including September 16, 2016 to file a Second Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 9/1/2016. (SEN) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.