Harbin v. Commissioner of Social Security

Justia Dockets & Filings Eleventh Circuit Florida Middle District Harbin v. Commissioner of Social Security

Harbin v. Commissioner of Social Security

Plaintiff:	Michael Doyle Harbin
Defendant:	Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number:	6:2015cv02132
Filed:	December 21, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office:	Orlando Office
County:	Volusia
Presiding Judge:	John Antoon
Presiding Judge:	David A. Baker
Nature of Suit:	Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 1, 2017	Filing 26 ORDER adopting 25 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; granting 24 Plaintiff's Unopposed MOTION for Attorney's Fees; Plaintiff is awarded $3,947.82 in attorney's fees; in her discretion, the Commissioner may pay all or part of t his amount to Plaintiff's counsel as set forth in the Report; directing the Clerk to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against the Commissioner for $3,947.82 in attorney's and paralegal's fees. Signed by Judge John Antoon II on 5/1/2017. (BRS)
February 27, 2017	Filing 21 ORDER adopting 18 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; the Commissioner's decision is reversed pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); the case is remanded to the Commissioner to reconsider the weight given to Dr. Ritter's opin ions, reevaluate Mr. Harbin's credibility, and to take any other appropriate action; the Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and to thereafter close this file. Signed by Judge John Antoon II on 2/27/2017. (BRS)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 1, 2017

Filing 26 ORDER adopting 25 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; granting 24 Plaintiff's Unopposed MOTION for Attorney's Fees; Plaintiff is awarded $3,947.82 in attorney's fees; in her discretion, the Commissioner may pay all or part of t his amount to Plaintiff's counsel as set forth in the Report; directing the Clerk to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against the Commissioner for $3,947.82 in attorney's and paralegal's fees. Signed by Judge John Antoon II on 5/1/2017. (BRS)

February 27, 2017

Filing 21 ORDER adopting 18 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; the Commissioner's decision is reversed pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); the case is remanded to the Commissioner to reconsider the weight given to Dr. Ritter's opin ions, reevaluate Mr. Harbin's credibility, and to take any other appropriate action; the Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and to thereafter close this file. Signed by Judge John Antoon II on 2/27/2017. (BRS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harbin v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Doyle Harbin
Represented By:	Richard A. Culbertson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?