Mayan v. Mayan et al
| Rahmatullah Mayan |
| Zarghee Mayan, Sohail Mayan and 786-ZZPA, Inc. |
| 6:2015cv02183 |
| December 30, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Orlando Office |
| Orange |
| G. Kendall Sharp |
| Thomas B. Smith |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
82
ORDER adopting and approving 81 Report and Recommendation. Defendant's Motion for Order to Show Cause 72 is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff Rahmatullah Mayan's Second Amended Complaint 21 is dismissed without preju dice. Plaintiff Rahmatullah Mayan's Answer to the Counterclaim 52 is stricken and the Clerk of Court is directed to enter default against Plaintiff Rahmatullah Mayan. Defendants are awarded $1,995.00 in attorneys' fees and $75 .00 for the court reporter fee, pursuant to Rule 37. Defendants' Counterclaim and Third-Party Complaint 32 are dismissed without prejudice to their timely re-filing in state court. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the file. Signed by Senior Judge G. Kendall Sharp on 8/3/2017. (SC)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 60 Motion to Compel ; granting in part and denying in part 61 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas B. Smith on 4/21/2017. (EC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
