Harvey, et al. v. Seminole County et al.
| Joseph Harvey and Anja Kannell |
| Seminole County, Sheriff, Seminole County Sheriff's Office, Steven Soto and Hall |
| 6:2016cv00056 |
| January 14, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Orlando Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Carlos E. Mendoza |
| Thomas B. Smith |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
ORDER denying 28 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis; Adopting Report and Recommendations - re 29 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 10/17/2017. (DJD)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER denying 10 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; Denying 12 Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis/affidavit of indigency; Adopting Report and Recommendations re 17 Report and Recommendations. The Amended Complaint (Doc. 16) is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 10/27/2016. (DJD)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations - re 11 Report and Recommendations; Overruling 13 Objection and Granting Motion for Extension; The Complaint (Doc. 1) is Dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff Harvey may file an Amended Complaint on or before March 25, 2016. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 3/10/2016. (DJD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
