Mt. Hawley Insurance Company v. Tactic Security Enforcement, Inc. et al
| Mt. Hawley Insurance Company |
| Tactic Security Enforcement, Inc., Adsan Properties, Inc. and Carlos Rodriguez |
| 6:2016cv01425 |
| August 9, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Orlando Office |
| Osceola |
| Paul G. Byron |
| Thomas B. Smith |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
188
ORDER denying 178 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law and Alternatively for a New Trial; granting 177 Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment. The 168 Declaratory Judgment Order and 169 Judgment shall be deemed replaced by the forthcoming Amended Declaratory Judgment Order and Amended Judgment. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to tax costs for Mt. Hawley Insurance Company in the amount of $2,181.60. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 7/20/2018. (JRJ)
|
|
Filing
122
ORDER denying 111 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment as to Indemnity Coverage; and denying 112 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment on the Issue of Indemnity. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 1/30/2018. (JRJ)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER denying 59 Defendant Tactic Security Enforcement, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint. Defendant has fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order to answer Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 5/17/2017. (SEN)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
