Kalch v. Raytheon Technical Services Company, LLC et al
| Steven Kalch |
| Raytheon Technical Services Company, LLC and Raytheon Company |
| 6:2016cv01529 |
| August 26, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Orlando Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Paul G. Byron |
| Karla R. Spaulding |
| False Claims Act |
| 31 U.S.C. ยง 3730 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
114
ORDER granting 78 Defendant Raytheon Company's Amended Motion for Final Summary Judgment; denying as moot 104 Defendant Raytheon Company's Motion in Limine. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Defendant Raytheon Company as stated herein. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 8/8/2017. (SEN)
|
|
Filing
94
ORDER denying 68 Defendant's Motion for Dismissal or Other Sanctions; denying as moot 73 Defendant's Motion for Leave to File Reply. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 7/20/2017. (SEN)
|
|
Filing
88
ORDER denying 86 Defendants' Motion for Immediate Court Order Setting the Location of Today's In-Person Attorney Pretrial Meeting. Counsel for Defendants, Vanessa Patel and Kevin D. Zwetsch, are admonished for preparing and filing the motion. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 7/11/2017. (SEN)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 60 Motion to Compel responses to discovery. See order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karla R. Spaulding on 3/20/2017. (Spaulding, Karla)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
