Mitchell v. North Carolina Medical Board et al
| Paul A. Mitchell |
| North Carolina Medical Board, Patrick Baestrieri, Sarah Early, Karen McGovern, Cheryl Hara, Ashley M. Klein, Sadzi Oliva and Daniel A. Kelber |
| 6:2016cv01648 |
| September 20, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Orlando Office |
| Orange |
| Daniel C. Irick |
| Roy B. Dalton |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
ORDER denying 40 Motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis/affidavit of indigency; adopting 42 Report and Recommendations.. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 3/20/2017. (VMF)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER terminating 28 Report and Recommendations.; denying 31 Motion to Disqualify; terminating 15 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 1/25/2017. (VMF)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER denying without prejudice 5 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 10/20/2016. (VMF)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER adopting and confirming 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; denying 3 Motion for Temporary Seal of § 1915 Application, Complaint, and Preliminary Injunction; denying without prejudice 2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 10/14/2016. (SWT)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
