Subpoena Upon NeJame Law, P.A.
Nejame Law, P.A. |
Patrick Cavanaugh |
6:2016mc00008 |
February 1, 2016 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Orlando Office |
Orange |
Carlos E. Mendoza |
Thomas B. Smith |
Other Statutory Actions |
Motion to Quash |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 ORDER granting 3 Motion to transfer case; carrying 1 Motion to Quash Subpoena. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas B. Smith on 4/21/2016. (Smith, Thomas) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Subpoena Upon NeJame Law, P.A. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Movant: Nejame Law, P.A. | |
Represented By: | Stephen J. Calvacca |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Receiver: Patrick Cavanaugh | |
Represented By: | Andrew M. Brumby |
Represented By: | Michael David Crosbie |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.