United States of America v. Barwick et al
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Vicky Barwick, Jasmine Morales and Q A Tax Service, Inc.
Case Number: 6:2017cv00035
Filed: January 9, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office: Orlando Office
County: Orange
Presiding Judge: G. Kendall Sharp
Presiding Judge: Thomas B. Smith
Nature of Suit: Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant)
Cause of Action: 26 U.S.C. ยง 7402
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER ADOPTING AND APPROVING 38 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff United States of America against Defendants Vicky Barwick, Jasmine Morales, and Q A Tax Service, Inc., jointly and se verally, in the amount of $389,656.00, on the United States' claim, brought under 26 U.S.C. Section 7402, for the disgorgement of ill-gotten gains Defendants Vicky Barwick, Jasmine Morales, and Q A Tax Service, Inc. received for the preparation of falsified tax retturns. Upon entry of judgment, the Clerk of Court shall terminate all pending motions and close the case. Signed by Senior Judge G. Kendall Sharp on 2/27/2018. (SC)
November 16, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER adopting and approving 31 Report and Recommendations. Plaintiff United States of America's Motion for Default Judgment 30 is granted in part and denied in part. The Motion is granted to the extent it seeks entry of a permanent inj unction on the terms proposed by Plaintiff and a finding that Plaintiff is entitled to remedy of disgorgement. The Motion is denied without prejudice to the extent it seeks entry of judgment of disgorgement in the amount of $389,656.00. A sepa rate Order of Permanent Injunction will follow entry of this Order. Plaintiff shall be given an opportunity to present evidence at evidentiary hearing before the United States Magistrate Judge to establish the amount of disgorgement. Signed by Senior Judge G. Kendall Sharp on 11/16/2017. (SC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. Barwick et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Daniel A. Applegate
Represented By: Joshua Y. Levine
Represented By: Jared S. Wiesner
Represented By: Alison Austen Yewdell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vicky Barwick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jasmine Morales
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Q A Tax Service, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?