Middleton v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Anna Marie Middleton
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 6:2017cv00085
Filed: January 19, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office: Orlando Office
County: Volusia
Presiding Judge: Paul G. Byron
Presiding Judge: Gregory J. Kelly
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER adopting 24 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Complaint filed by Anna Marie Middleton. The Commissioner's final decision is AFFIRMED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the file. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 3/16/2018. (MMW)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Middleton v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anna Marie Middleton
Represented By: Richard A. Culbertson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?