Sanchez v. Commissioner of Social Security

Justia Dockets & Filings Eleventh Circuit Florida Middle District Sanchez v. Commissioner of Social Security

Sanchez v. Commissioner of Social Security

Plaintiff:	Alex Sanchez
Defendant:	Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number:	6:2017cv00535
Filed:	March 27, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office:	Orlando Office
County:	Osceola
Presiding Judge:	Paul G. Byron
Presiding Judge:	James R. Klindt
Nature of Suit:	Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 1, 2018	Filing 25 ORDER adopting 24 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 23 Unopposed MOTION for Attorney Fees filed by Alex Sanchez. The Unopposed Motion for Attorney's Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act (Doc. 23) is GRANTED to the extent that the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant for attorneys' fees in the amount of $6,870.95 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). The Motion is otherwise DENIED. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 6/1/2018. (MMW)
February 14, 2018	Filing 21 ORDER adopting 20 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Complaint filed by Alex Sanchez. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), as incorporated by § 1393(c)(3), REVERSING the Commissioner's final decision and REMANDING this matter with the instructions described more fully in the Order. The Clerk is further DIRECTED to terminate any pending motions and close the file. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 2/14/2018. (MMW)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 1, 2018

Filing 25 ORDER adopting 24 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 23 Unopposed MOTION for Attorney Fees filed by Alex Sanchez. The Unopposed Motion for Attorney's Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act (Doc. 23) is GRANTED to the extent that the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant for attorneys' fees in the amount of $6,870.95 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). The Motion is otherwise DENIED. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 6/1/2018. (MMW)

February 14, 2018

Filing 21 ORDER adopting 20 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Complaint filed by Alex Sanchez. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), as incorporated by § 1393(c)(3), REVERSING the Commissioner's final decision and REMANDING this matter with the instructions described more fully in the Order. The Clerk is further DIRECTED to terminate any pending motions and close the file. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 2/14/2018. (MMW)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sanchez v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alex Sanchez
Represented By:	Adam S Neidenberg
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?