Cotrich v. IRS Internal Revenue Service
Plaintiff: Miguel A. Cotrich
Defendant: IRS Internal Revenue Service
Case Number: 6:2017cv00719
Filed: April 21, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office: Orlando Office
County: Lake
Presiding Judge: G. Kendall Sharp
Presiding Judge: Thomas B. Smith
Nature of Suit: Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant)
Cause of Action: 26 U.S.C. ยง 6212
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER adopting and approving 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Plaintiff Miguel A. Cotrich's Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis 2 is denied and the Amended Complaint 6 is dismissed. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the case. Signed by Senior Judge G. Kendall Sharp on 6/13/2017. (SC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cotrich v. IRS Internal Revenue Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Miguel A. Cotrich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: IRS Internal Revenue Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?