Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. General Projection Systems, Inc. et al
Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor |
General Projection Systems, Inc., Cheryl Wayson, Drake Wayson, General Projection Systems, Inc. 401(k) Plan and General Projection Systems, Inc Group Health Plan |
6:2017cv00855 |
May 12, 2017 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Orlando Office |
Seminole |
Karla R. Spaulding |
Roy B. Dalton |
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 73 ORDER adopting 72 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 71 MOTION for default judgment against All Defendants filed by Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 12/10/2018. (JLC) |
Filing 61 ORDER adopting 59 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 52 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Cheryl Wayson as a Defendant in this action filed by Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor. The Clerk is DIRECTED to TERMINATE Cheryl Wayson as a party. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 6/8/2018. (ctp)(JLC) |
Filing 54 ORDER adopting 48 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Complaint filed by Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor. The Clerk is DIRECTED to TERMINATE Drake Wayson as a party. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 4/11/2018. (ctp)(JLC) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.