Cardona v. Suntrust Mortgage, Inc. et al
| Bertulfo Cardona |
| Federal National Mortgage Association and Suntrust Mortgage, Inc. |
| 6:2017cv01556 |
| August 25, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Orlando Office |
| Orange |
| Gregory J Kelly |
| Carlos E Mendoza |
| Consumer Credit |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #2 Complaint by Federal National Mortgage Association. (Filed in State Court on 8/14/2017) (JEV) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly. |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #2 Complaint by Suntrust Mortgage, Inc. (Filed in State Court on 8/11/2017) (JEV) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly. |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Federal National Mortgage Association, Suntrust Mortgage, Inc. with Jury Demand filed by Bertulfo Cardona. (Filed in State Court on or about 7/13/2017) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(JEV) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Circuit Court, case number 2017-CA-006449-O filed in State Court on 7/13/2017. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number Orl-066484 filed by Federal National Mortgage Association. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A)(JEV) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
