Bristol v. Commissioner of Social Security

Justia Dockets & Filings Eleventh Circuit Florida Middle District Bristol v. Commissioner of Social Security

Bristol v. Commissioner of Social Security

Plaintiff:	Gladinet Bristol
Defendant:	Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number:	6:2017cv02022
Filed:	November 22, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office:	Orlando Office
County:	Osceola
Presiding Judge:	Paul G. Byron
Presiding Judge:	Daniel C. Irick
Nature of Suit:	Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 3, 2018	Filing 18 ORDER adopting 16 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Complaint filed by Gladinet Bristol. The Unopposed Motion for Entry of Judgment with Remand (Doc. 15) is GRANTED. The final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (the Commission er) is REVERSED and REMANDED to the Commissioner pursuant to sentence four of Section 405(g). The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter a separate judgment in favor of Plaintiff and to close the file. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 5/3/2018. (MMW)
May 1, 2018	Filing 16 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 1 Complaint filed by Gladinet Bristol. It is RECOMMENDED that the Motion (Doc. 15) be GRANTED; the final decision of the Commissioner be REVERSED and REMANDED to the Commissioner pursuant to sentence four of Section 405(g); and the Clerk be directed to enter a separate judgment in favor of Plaintiff and to close the case. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick on 5/1/2018. (RN)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 3, 2018

Filing 18 ORDER adopting 16 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Complaint filed by Gladinet Bristol. The Unopposed Motion for Entry of Judgment with Remand (Doc. 15) is GRANTED. The final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (the Commission er) is REVERSED and REMANDED to the Commissioner pursuant to sentence four of Section 405(g). The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter a separate judgment in favor of Plaintiff and to close the file. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 5/3/2018. (MMW)

May 1, 2018

Filing 16 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 1 Complaint filed by Gladinet Bristol. It is RECOMMENDED that the Motion (Doc. 15) be GRANTED; the final decision of the Commissioner be REVERSED and REMANDED to the Commissioner pursuant to sentence four of Section 405(g); and the Clerk be directed to enter a separate judgment in favor of Plaintiff and to close the case. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick on 5/1/2018. (RN)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bristol v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gladinet Bristol
Represented By:	Richard A. Culbertson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?